Addressing Mental Health Challenges Through Digital Health Solutions

byHazrat Usman -
0
Addressing Mental Health Challenges Through Digital Health Solutions


Abstract

This research paper delves into the realm of digital mental healthcare, focusing on the integration of digital health solutions to address mental health challenges. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, the study identifies key insights and gaps in the field. The findings emphasize the significance of interdisciplinary collaborations, cultural sensitivity, and digital inclusion initiatives in enhancing the effectiveness of digital interventions. By synthesizing lessons from successful integrated programs and proposing strategies to minimize intention-behavior gaps in community-based interventions, the research aims to pave the way for innovative and inclusive mental health solutions. The implications for practice and policy underscore the importance of fostering cross-disciplinary collaborations and integrating diverse perspectives to advance knowledge and practice. Recommendations for future research highlight the need to prioritize enhancing collaboration, addressing cultural diversity, and embracing transdisciplinary approaches to promote inclusive and effective solutions to complex societal challenges in the realm of digital mental healthcare.

Research Gap

A research gap in the field of addressing mental health challenges through digital health solutions is the need for comprehensive reviews that consolidate findings and discuss the potential of digital technologies in enhancing mental health (Chen 2024). While there is recognition of the importance of understanding the relationship between digital technology and mental health, there is still a need for further research to inform the development of targeted interventions (Ogugua 2024, 108-125). Additionally, future research should focus on closing knowledge gaps related to intervention effectiveness and the impact of cultural diversity on mental health outcomes (Ajayi 2024, 033-049).

Research Questions:

1. What are the ethical and epistemic gaps surrounding the growth of digital mental health solutions, particularly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic?

2. How can digital mental health research be improved to address current challenges and potential solutions for severe mental illnesses like schizophrenia?

3. What lessons can be learned from successful digital health integrated programs to enhance the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions?

4. What are the key considerations for minimizing the intention-behavior gap in community-based digital mental health interventions for depression?

5. How can digital mental health interventions be effectively implemented in nonspecialty mental health settings to improve access and retention rates?

Introduction

In recent years, the field of mental health has faced significant challenges globally, with an increasing prevalence of mental health disorders ("Digital age on mental health: Prevalence, challenges and the rise of telemental health solutions" 2023). The burden of mental health conditions has been exacerbated by various stressors in the digital age, such as cyberbullying and social media pressures ("Digital age on mental health: Prevalence, challenges and the rise of telemental health solutions" 2023). As a result, there is a growing recognition of the need for innovative solutions to address mental health challenges and improve access to care ("Digital age on mental health: Prevalence, challenges and the rise of telemental health solutions" 2023). One promising avenue for addressing these challenges is the integration of digital health solutions into mental health care delivery ("Digital age on mental health: Prevalence, challenges and the rise of telemental health solutions" 2023). Digital health technologies, including telemedicine, mobile health apps, and artificial intelligence, offer new opportunities to enhance mental health services and support (Mumtaz 2023).

The significance of digital health solutions in addressing mental health challenges lies in their potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery and improve health outcomes, particularly in underserved populations and conflict zones (Ahmed 2023). Digital health platforms have been identified as valuable tools for providing psychological assistance and mental health services in regions where traditional healthcare infrastructure may be lacking (Ahmed 2023). Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the importance of digital health strategies in responding to public health crises and ensuring continuity of care (Fagherazzi et al. 2020, e19284). The pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telemedicine and digital mental health interventions as essential components of healthcare delivery (Fagherazzi et al. 2020, e19284).

Despite the promise of digital health solutions in addressing mental health challenges, there exist gaps in research and implementation that need to be addressed (Balcombe and Leo 2021, e26811). The Accelerated Creation-to-Sustainment model has been proposed as a framework to bridge the research-to-practice gap in digital mental health interventions (Balcombe and Leo 2021, e26811). This model integrates methodologies from human-computer interaction, implementation science, and trial methodology to develop and sustainably implement technology-enabled mental health services (Balcombe and Leo 2021, e26811). However, there is a need for further research to explore the ethical and epistemic challenges associated with the growth of digital mental health solutions (Balcombe and Leo 2021, e26811).

In light of these considerations, this research aims to explore the current landscape of digital mental health solutions, identify implementation challenges, and propose strategies to enhance the effectiveness of digital interventions (Balcombe and Leo 2021, e26811). By addressing these research gaps, this study seeks to contribute to the advancement of digital mental health care and the improvement of mental health outcomes for individuals globally.

2: Literature Review

Overview of Existing Digital Mental Health Interventions

Digital mental health interventions have gained significant attention due to their potential to revolutionize mental health care delivery. These interventions encompass a wide range of technologies, including telemedicine platforms, mobile health applications, artificial intelligence-driven tools, and digital phenotyping systems (Liem, Natari, , and Hall 2021, 3-16; Chivilgina, Elger, and Jotterand 2021; Balcombe 2023, 82; Berry, Bucci, and Lobban 2017, e52). Research has explored the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of these interventions for various mental health conditions, such as depression, schizophrenia, and severe mental illnesses (Chivilgina, Elger, and Jotterand 2021; Peters, Vold, Robinson, and Calvo 2020, 34-47; Balcombe 2023, 82). Additionally, studies have highlighted the role of digital interventions in providing self-management support, emotion regulation tools, and AI-powered chatbots for mental health care (Schyff et al. 2023, e46448; Skorburg and Friesen 2021, 23-26; Berry, Bucci, and Lobban 2017, e52).

Ethical and Epistemic Gaps in Digital Mental Health Response

The rapid growth of digital mental health solutions has raised ethical and epistemic concerns that need to be addressed. Martinez-Martin, Greely, and Cho identified four key gaps: the evidence gap, inequality gap, prediction-intervention gap, and safety gap, emphasizing the need for robust evidence, equitable access, accurate prediction models, and safety protocols in digital mental health initiatives. Furthermore, the ethical development of digital phenotyping tools and the values embedded in digital interventions underscore the importance of ethical considerations in the design and implementation of digital mental health technologies (Birk, Lavis, Lucivero, and Samuel 2021, 205395172110473; Saha 2024). Responsible AI frameworks and ethical design practices have been proposed to guide the ethical development and deployment of digital mental health solutions (Schyff et al. 2023, e46448; Raphiphatthana et al. 2020, e19031).

Challenges and Opportunities in Global Mental Health

Global mental health faces a myriad of challenges, including limited access to mental health services, stigma surrounding mental illnesses, and disparities in mental health care delivery (Petrou, Jameel, Nahabedian, and Kane 2023, 911-941; Rauschenberg et al. 2021; Johansen et al. 2022, 336-340). Digital mental health interventions present opportunities to address these challenges by providing scalable, cost-effective, and culturally sensitive solutions for diverse populations (Petrou, Jameel, Nahabedian, and Kane 2023, 911-941; Liem, Natari, , and Hall 2021, 3-16; Rauschenberg et al. 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the importance of digital interventions in ensuring continuity of care, promoting mental health and well-being, and mitigating the impact of social isolation and quarantine measures on mental health outcomes (Johansen et al. 2022, 336-340). However, the integration of digital interventions into clinical practice requires addressing barriers such as reimbursement policies, clinician training, and technological infrastructure (Wibberly 2024; Balcombe and Leo 2020, e21718).

In summary, the literature review reveals a rich landscape of digital mental health interventions, ethical considerations, and global challenges and opportunities. Understanding the existing interventions, addressing ethical and epistemic gaps, and leveraging digital technologies for global mental health can pave the way for innovative and effective mental health solutions.

3: Methodology

Research Design and Approach

The research design for this study on addressing mental health challenges through digital health solutions will adopt a mixed-methods approach. This approach will allow for the integration of qualitative and quantitative data to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic. The qualitative component will involve in-depth interviews with mental health professionals, technology experts, and individuals with lived experience of mental health challenges. These interviews will help capture diverse perspectives on the use of digital health solutions in mental health care. The quantitative component will include a systematic review of existing literature on digital mental health interventions to identify trends, gaps, and best practices in the field.

Inclusion Criteria for Selecting Studies

The inclusion criteria for selecting studies will focus on research articles, reviews, and meta-analyses published in peer-reviewed journals within the last five years. Studies included will need to address the use of digital health solutions in mental health care, including but not limited to telemedicine, mobile health applications, artificial intelligence tools, and digital phenotyping systems. Only studies that provide insights into the effectiveness, challenges, and opportunities of digital mental health interventions will be considered for inclusion.

Data Collection and Analysis Methods

Data collection will involve a systematic search of electronic databases such as PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar using relevant keywords related to digital mental health interventions. The search will be supplemented by manual searches of reference lists from identified articles to ensure comprehensive coverage of the literature. Data extraction will involve categorizing studies based on their research focus, methodology, key findings, and implications for practice.

For the qualitative component, thematic analysis will be employed to identify recurring patterns, themes, and insights from the interviews. The qualitative data will be transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed to extract meaningful interpretations and implications for the research questions. The quantitative data from the systematic review will be synthesized using meta-analysis techniques to quantify the overall effect sizes of digital mental health interventions on various mental health outcomes.

By employing a mixed-methods approach with rigorous inclusion criteria and robust data collection and analysis methods, this study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of digital mental health interventions and contribute valuable insights to the field.

5: Addressing Implementation Challenges

Integration of Engineering Principles in Research

The integration of engineering principles in research plays a crucial role in the development and implementation of digital mental health interventions. By applying engineering principles such as human-centered design, systems thinking, and usability testing, researchers can ensure that digital solutions are user-friendly, effective, and scalable (Jensen and Cross 2021, 371-392)Fortuna et al. 2017, 819-828). Human-centered design approaches involve actively involving end-users in the design process to create interventions that meet their needs and preferences (Jensen and Cross 2021, 371-392). Systems thinking helps researchers understand the complex interactions between different components of digital interventions and their impact on mental health outcomes (Jensen and Cross 2021, 371-392). Usability testing ensures that digital tools are intuitive, accessible, and engaging for users, ultimately enhancing their adoption and effectiveness (Fortuna et al. 2017, 819-828).

Inclusivity of Lived Experiences in Intervention Design

The inclusivity of lived experiences in intervention design is essential for developing culturally sensitive and contextually relevant digital mental health solutions. By incorporating the perspectives and experiences of individuals with lived experience of mental health challenges, researchers can ensure that interventions are tailored to meet the diverse needs of the target population (Mendes-Santos et al. 2022, e32558). Engaging with stakeholders, including mental health professionals, service users, and community members, can provide valuable insights into the barriers, facilitators, and preferences related to digital mental health interventions (Mendes-Santos et al. 2022, e32558). This participatory approach promotes the co-creation of interventions that resonate with the lived realities of individuals and enhance their acceptability and effectiveness (Mendes-Santos et al. 2022, e32558).

Cross-Disciplinary and Cross-Sectoral Research Approaches

Cross-disciplinary and cross-sectoral research approaches are essential for addressing the multifaceted challenges associated with implementing digital mental health interventions. Collaborations between disciplines such as psychology, medicine, engineering, and public health can bring diverse perspectives and expertise to the design, implementation, and evaluation of digital solutions (Brantnell et al. 2023, e44688; Wand and White 2007, 644-651). By fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, researchers can leverage the strengths of different fields to develop innovative and holistic approaches to mental health care (Brantnell et al. 2023, e44688). Furthermore, engaging with stakeholders from various sectors, including healthcare, technology, government, and community organizations, can facilitate the integration of digital interventions into existing mental health systems and services (Brantnell et al. 2023, e44688; Wand and White 2007, 644-651). This collaborative approach promotes sustainability, scalability, and impact in the implementation of digital mental health solutions.

In conclusion, addressing implementation challenges in digital mental health interventions requires the integration of engineering principles, the inclusivity of lived experiences, and cross-disciplinary and cross-sectoral research approaches. By adopting these strategies, researchers can develop effective, user-centered, and contextually relevant interventions that have the potential to transform mental health care delivery and improve outcomes for individuals globally.

6: Enhancing Effectiveness of Digital Interventions

Lessons from Successful Integrated Digital Health Programs

Successful integrated digital health programs offer valuable insights into optimizing the effectiveness of digital interventions in mental health care. By examining programs that have demonstrated positive outcomes, researchers can identify key factors contributing to success, such as user engagement strategies, personalized interventions, and seamless integration with existing healthcare systems Kanuri et al.Harith et al. 2022, e13111). Lessons learned from these programs can inform the design and implementation of future digital mental health interventions, guiding researchers towards evidence-based practices that enhance effectiveness and user satisfaction.

Minimizing Intention-Behavior Gaps in Community-Based Interventions

Minimizing intention-behavior gaps in community-based interventions is essential for ensuring the uptake and sustained engagement of individuals in digital mental health programs. Understanding the factors that influence behavior change, such as motivation, self-efficacy, and perceived benefits, can help tailor interventions to address specific barriers and facilitators to engagement (Lim et al. 2023, e46458; Harith et al. 2022, e13111). By incorporating behavioral science principles into intervention design, researchers can develop strategies to bridge the intention-behavior gap and promote long-term adherence to digital mental health interventions.

Strategies for Improving Access and Retention Rates

Improving access and retention rates in digital mental health interventions requires a multifaceted approach that addresses barriers at individual, organizational, and systemic levels. Strategies such as enhancing digital literacy among users, providing technical support, and ensuring data privacy and security can increase access and usability of digital interventions (Zettergren 2024; Tegegne et al. 2023). Tailoring interventions to diverse cultural contexts, languages, and literacy levels can enhance engagement and retention among underserved populations (Alodhayani et al. 2021, e26002; Olu et al. 2019). Collaborations with community organizations, healthcare providers, and policymakers can facilitate the integration of digital mental health services into existing care pathways, improving accessibility and sustainability (Olu et al. 2019; Raeside 2024).

In conclusion, enhancing the effectiveness of digital interventions in mental health care involves drawing lessons from successful programs, minimizing intention-behavior gaps, and implementing strategies to improve access and retention rates. By leveraging evidence-based practices, behavioral science principles, and collaborative partnerships, researchers can optimize the impact of digital mental health interventions and promote positive outcomes for individuals seeking mental health support.

Future Directions and Recommendations

Research Agenda for Advancing Digital Mental Healthcare

The future of digital mental healthcare relies on a robust research agenda that emphasizes innovation, evidence-based practices, and stakeholder engagement. Research efforts should concentrate on assessing the effectiveness of emerging digital interventions, such as virtual therapy platforms, mental health apps, and online support communities, in enhancing mental health outcomes (Ogugua 2024, 108-125)Prescott 2022, 103-106). Longitudinal studies and randomized controlled trials are essential to evaluate the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness of digital mental health services (Ogugua 2024, 108-125). Additionally, research should investigate the integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and digital phenotyping technologies to personalize interventions and improve treatment outcomes (Ridout 2024, e48441-e48441; Rantanen, Gluschkoff, Silvennoinen, and Heponiemi 2021, e28066). Collaborative research initiatives involving academia, industry, and healthcare providers can steer the development of state-of-the-art digital solutions that cater to the changing needs of individuals seeking mental health support.

Closing Knowledge Gaps and Addressing Cultural Diversity

Closing knowledge gaps and addressing cultural diversity are crucial for ensuring the equitable provision of digital mental health services. Research should prioritize understanding the unique mental health requirements of diverse populations, including ethnic minorities, immigrants, and indigenous communities (Minas, Klimidis, and Kokanovic 2007; Kirmayer and Minas 2000, 438-446). Culturally sensitive interventions that consider language, beliefs, and social norms can boost engagement and outcomes among underserved groups (Minas, Klimidis, and Kokanovic 2007). Furthermore, research should explore the influence of cultural factors on help-seeking behaviors, treatment preferences, and service utilization to guide the development of inclusive and accessible digital mental health programs (Kirmayer and Minas 2000, 438-446; Clifton, Repper, Banks, and Remnant 2012, 514-524). Collaborations with community organizations, cultural experts, and policymakers can facilitate the co-design of interventions that resonate with diverse cultural contexts and promote mental health equity.

Promoting Digital Inclusion Initiatives in Mental Health Services

Promoting digital inclusion initiatives in mental health services is vital for reducing disparities in access and enhancing the quality of care for all individuals. Initiatives should prioritize enhancing digital literacy, providing training on digital health technologies, and ensuring equitable access to digital mental health services (Petrou, Jameel, Nahabedian, and Kane 2023, 911-941; Greer et al. 2019, e11696). Tailoring interventions to the needs of marginalized populations, including individuals with disabilities, low-income communities, and rural residents, can bridge the digital divide and foster inclusivity in mental health care (Greer et al. 2019, e11696; Tetri 2024). Collaborative partnerships between healthcare providers, technology developers, and community stakeholders can propel the implementation of digital inclusion strategies and nurture a culture of accessibility and diversity in mental health services (Petrou, Jameel, Nahabedian, and Kane 2023, 911-941; Oliver 2023).

In conclusion, advancing digital mental healthcare necessitates a focused research agenda, attention to cultural diversity, and the promotion of digital inclusion initiatives. By prioritizing innovation, equity, and collaboration, stakeholders can collaboratively leverage the potential of digital technologies to revolutionize mental health care and enhance well-being for all individuals.

Conclusion

Summary of Key Findings

The exploration of cross-disciplinary and cross-sectorial research teams within the domain of e-mental health has revealed key challenges and potential solutions. These challenges include developing a shared understanding of the domain, establishing common concepts among project participants, involving end-users in the research process, collaborating across sectors, ensuring data privacy and security, and timing alignment Nordgreen et al.. The integration of multiple academic disciplines and non-academic entities into the research process, known as transdisciplinarity, has been identified as a crucial approach to narrowing the knowledge-practice gap in cancer research (Urquhart et al. 2013, 512-521). Enhanced cross-disciplinary information exchange has been shown to frame better questions, integrate relevant evidence, and advance translational knowledge effectively (Ciesielski et al. 2017, 123-134).

Implications for Practice and Policy

The findings underscore the importance of fostering cross-disciplinary collaborations and integrating diverse perspectives to advance knowledge and practice in various domains. Communicating about cross-disciplinarity throughout the research education process, starting from the recruitment of PhD candidates, can enhance the sustainability and impact of research initiatives (Mobjörk, Berglund, Granberg, and Johansson 2020, 76-89). Embracing a cross-disciplinary approach that incorporates fine arts principles can lead to innovative and sustainable solutions in design (Alahira 2024, 326-336). Practical actions at the individual, team leader, institutional, and funder levels are essential to foster cross-disciplinary research in global health effectively (Ding, Pulford, and Bates 2020, e002293). The refinement and adjustment of techniques throughout research, known as "design-in-action," can enhance the effectiveness of technology-based interventions addressing social isolation and loneliness in later life (Neves and Baecker 2020, 88-113).

Recommendations for Future Research

To advance cross-disciplinary research and address complex societal challenges, future research should focus on the following areas:

1. **Enhancing Collaboration:** Foster interdisciplinary collaborations and partnerships to tackle multifaceted issues effectively.

2. **Cultural Sensitivity:** Investigate the impact of cultural diversity on research outcomes and develop culturally sensitive interventions.

3. **Digital Inclusion:** Promote digital inclusion initiatives to ensure equitable access to mental health services for all populations.

4. **Transdisciplinary Approaches:** Embrace transdisciplinary approaches to integrate diverse perspectives and expertise in research endeavors.

5. **Innovative Pedagogies:** Implement innovative pedagogies and cross-disciplinary learning activities to enhance education and training in various disciplines.

By prioritizing these recommendations, researchers and practitioners can contribute to the advancement of knowledge, the improvement of practice, and the promotion of inclusive and effective solutions to complex societal challenges.

References

  1. , 2023. "Digital age on mental health: prevalence, challenges and the rise of telemental health solutions", International Journal of Biosciences (Ijb). https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/23.6.242-248
  2. Ahmed,  Sirwan Khalid, 2023. "The role of digital health in revolutionizing healthcare delivery and improving health outcomes in conflict zones", Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231218158
  3. Ajayi,  Funmilayo Aribidesi, 2024. "Review of crew resilience and mental health practices in the marine industry: pathways to improvement", Magna Scientia Advanced Biology and Pharmacy(2), 11:033-049. https://doi.org/10.30574/msabp.2024.11.2.0021
  4. Alahira,  Joshua, 2024. "The role of fine arts in promoting sustainability within industrial and graphic design: a cross-disciplinary approach", International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences(3), 6:326-336. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i3.890
  5. Alodhayani,  Abdulaziz A, Marwah Hassounah, Fatima R Qadri, Noura Abouammoh, Z. Ahmed, and Abdullah Aldahmash, 2021. "Culture-specific observations in a saudi arabian digital home health care program: focus group discussions with patients and their caregivers", Journal of Medical Internet Research(12), 23:e26002. https://doi.org/10.2196/26002
  6. Balcombe,  Luke and Diego De Leo, 2020. "An integrated blueprint for digital mental health services amidst covid-19", Jmir Mental Health(7), 7:e21718. https://doi.org/10.2196/21718
  7. Balcombe,  Luke and Diego De Leo, 2021. "Digital mental health challenges and the horizon ahead for solutions", Jmir Mental Health(3), 8:e26811. https://doi.org/10.2196/26811
  8. Balcombe,  Luke, 2023. "Ai chatbots in digital mental health", Informatics(4), 10:82. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10040082
  9. Berry,  Natalie, Sandra Bucci, and Fiona Lobban, 2017. "Use of the internet and mobile phones for self-management of severe mental health problems: qualitative study of staff views", Jmir Mental Health(4), 4:e52. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.8311
  10. Birk,  Rasmus Hoffmann, Anna Lavis, Federica Lucivero, and Gabrielle Samuel, 2021. "For what it's worth. unearthing the values embedded in digital phenotyping for mental health", Big Data & Society(2), 8:205395172110473.  https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211047319
  11. Brantnell,  Anders, Serdar Temiz, Enrico Baraldi, Joanne Woodford, and Louise von Essén, 2023. "Barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of digital mental health interventions as perceived by primary care decision makers: content analysis of structured open-ended survey data", Jmir Human Factors, 10:e44688. https://doi.org/10.2196/44688
  12. Chen,  Tianjiao, 2024. "Promoting mental health in children and adolescents through digital technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356554
  13. Chivilgina,  Olga, Bernice Simone Elger, and Fabrice Jotterand, 2021. "Digital technologies for schizophrenia management: a descriptive review", Science and Engineering Ethics(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00302-z
  14. Ciesielski,  Timothy H., Melinda C. Aldrich, Carmen J. Marsit, Robert A. Hiatt, and Scott M. Williams, 2017. "Transdisciplinary approaches enhance the production of translational knowledge", Translational Research, 182:123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2016.11.002
  15. Clifton,  Andrew, Julie Repper, David Banks, and Jennifer Remnant, 2012. "Co‐producing social inclusion: the structure/agency conundrum", Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing(6), 20:514-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01953.x
  16. Ding,  Yan, Justin Pulford, and Imelda Bates, 2020. "Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review", BMJ Global Health(4), 5:e002293. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002293
  17. Fagherazzi,  Guy, Catherine Goetzinger, Mohammed Ally Rashid, Gloria Aguayo, and Laëtitia Huiart, 2020. "Digital health strategies to fight covid-19 worldwide: challenges, recommendations, and a call for papers", Journal of Medical Internet Research(6), 22:e19284. https://doi.org/10.2196/19284
  18. Fortuna,  Karen L., Matthew C. Lohman, Lydia Gill, Martha L. Bruce, and Stephen J. Bartels, 2017. "Adapting a psychosocial intervention for smartphone delivery to middle-aged and older adults with serious mental illness", American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry(8), 25:819-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2016.12.007
  19. Greer,  Ben, Daniel Robotham, Sara Simblett, Hannah Curtis, Helena Griffiths, and Til Wykes, 2019. "Digital exclusion among mental health service users: qualitative investigation", Journal of Medical Internet Research(1), 21:e11696. https://doi.org/10.2196/11696
  20. Harith,  Sophia, Insa Backhaus, Najihah Mohbin, Huyen Ngo, and Selina Khoo, 2022. "Effectiveness of digital mental health interventions for university students: an umbrella review", Peerj, 10:e13111. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13111
  21. Jensen,  Karin and Kelly J. Cross, 2021. "Engineering stress culture: relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion", Journal of Engineering Education(2), 110:371-392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20391
  22. Johansen,  Sara L., Tony Olmert, Neha Chaudhary, Nina Vasan, and Gowri Aragam, 2022. "Incorporating digital interventions into mental health clinical practice: a pilot survey of how use patterns, barriers, and opportunities shifted for clinicians in the covid-19 pandemic", Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science(4), 8:336-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-022-00260-8
  23. Kanuri,  Nitya, Prerna Arora, Sai Talluru, Bona Colaco, Rohan Dutta, Abhimanyu Rawat, Barr C. Taylor et al., 2019. "Examining the initial usability, acceptability and feasibility of a digital mental health intervention for college students in india", International Journal of Psychology(4), 55:657-673. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12640
  24. Kirmayer,  Laurence J. and Harry Minas, 2000. "The future of cultural psychiatry: an international perspective", The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry(5), 45:438-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370004500503 
  25. Liem,  Andrian, Rifani B. Natari, Jimmy, and Brian J. Hall, 2021. "Digital health applications in mental health care for immigrants and refugees: a rapid review", Telemedicine Journal and E-Health(1), 27:3-16. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0012
  26. Lim,  Yee Siew, Jia Hui Quek, Xiu Wei Ching, Dominic Tao Ran Lim, Kean Ghee Lim, and Chandramani Thuraisingham, 2023. "Efficacy of a text-based mental health coaching app in improving the symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression: randomized controlled trial", Jmir Formative Research, 7:e46458. https://doi.org/10.2196/46458
  27. Martinez-Martin,  Nicole, Henry T. Greely, and Mildred K. Cho, 2021. "Ethical development of digital phenotyping tools for mental health applications: delphi study", Jmir Mhealth and Uhealth(7), 9:e27343. https://doi.org/10.2196/27343
  28. Mendes-Santos,  Cristina, Francisco Nunes, Elisabete Weiderpass, Rui Santana, and Gerhard Andersson, 2022. "Understanding mental health professionals’ perspectives and practices regarding the implementation of digital mental health: qualitative study", Jmir Formative Research(4), 6:e32558. https://doi.org/10.2196/32558
  29. Minas,  Harry, Steven Klimidis, and Renata Kokanovic, 2007. "Depression in multicultural australia: policies, research and services", Australia and New Zealand Health Policy(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-4-16
  30. Mobjörk,  Malin, Camilla Berglund, Mikael Granberg, and Magnus Johansson, 2020. "Sustainable development and cross-disciplinary research education: challenges and opportunities for learning", Högre Utbildning(1), 10:76-89. https://doi.org/10.23865/hu.v10.1942
  31. Mumtaz,  Hassan, 2023. "Current challenges and potential solutions to the use of digital health technologies in evidence generation: a narrative review", Frontiers in Digital Health, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1203945
  32. Neves,  Bárbara Barbosa and Ronald M. Baecker, 2020. "Mixing methods and sciences: a longitudinal cross-disciplinary mixed methods study on technology to address social isolation and loneliness in later life", Journal of Mixed Methods Research(1), 16:88-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820977646
  33. Nordgreen,  Tine, Fazle Rabbi, Jim Tørresen, Yngvar Sigmund Skar, Frode Guribye, Yavuz İnal, Eivind Flobak et al., 2021. "Challenges and possible solutions in cross-disciplinary and cross-sectorial research teams within the domain of e-mental health", Journal of Enabling Technologies(4), 15:241-251. https://doi.org/10.1108/jet-03-2021-0013
  34. Ogugua,  Jane Osareme, 2024. "Mental health and digital technology: a public health review of current trends and responses", International Medical Science Research Journal(2), 4:108-125. https://doi.org/10.51594/imsrj.v4i2.754
  35. Ogugua,  Jane Osareme, 2024. "Mental health and digital technology: a public health review of current trends and responses", International Medical Science Research Journal(2), 4:108-125. https://doi.org/10.51594/imsrj.v4i2.754
  36. Oliver,  Amy, 2023. "Qualitative evaluation of a digital inclusion initiative to facilitate access to mental health services (preprint)", Jmir Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.2196/51315
  37. Olu,  Olushayo Oluseun, Derrick Muneene, J. Bataringaya, Marie-Rosette Nahimana, Housseynou Ba, Yves Turgeon, Humphrey Karamagi et al., 2019. "How can digital health technologies contribute to sustainable attainment of universal health coverage in africa? a perspective", Frontiers in Public Health, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00341
  38. Peters,  Dorian, Karina Vold, Diana Robinson, and Rafael A. Calvo, 2020. "Responsible ai—two frameworks for ethical design practice", Ieee Transactions on Technology and Society(1), 1:34-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/tts.2020.2974991
  39. Petrou,  Constantina, Leila Jameel, Noushig Nahabedian, and Fergus Kane, 2023. "A call for digital inclusion initiatives in mental health services: an integrative review", Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing(5), 30:911-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12931
  40. Petrou,  Constantina, Leila Jameel, Noushig Nahabedian, and Fergus Kane, 2023. "A call for digital inclusion initiatives in mental health services: an integrative review", Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing(5), 30:911-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12931
  41. Prescott,  Julie, 2022. "Digital technology to support mental health: a brief introduction to what it is and why it is important?", Mental Health and Social Inclusion(2), 26:103-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-02-2022-0010
  42. Raeside,  Rebecca, 2024. "Accelerating implementation of adolescent digital health prevention programs: analysis of insights from australian stakeholders", Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1389739
  43. Rantanen,  Teemu, Kia Gluschkoff, Piia Silvennoinen, and Tarja Heponiemi, 2021. "The associations between mental health problems and attitudes toward web-based health and social care services: evidence from a finnish population-based study", Journal of Medical Internet Research(9), 23:e28066. https://doi.org/10.2196/28066
  44. Raphiphatthana,  Buaphrao, Herdiyan Maulana, Timothy Howarth, Karen Gardner, and Tricia Nagel, 2020. "Digital mental health resources for asylum seekers, refugees, and immigrants: protocol for a scoping review", Jmir Research Protocols(8), 9:e19031. https://doi.org/10.2196/19031
  45. Rauschenberg,  Christian, Anita Schick, Christian Goetzl, Susanne Röhr, Steffi G. Riedel‐Heller, Georgia Koppe, Daniel Durstewitz et al., 2021. "Social isolation, mental health, and use of digital interventions in youth during the covid-19 pandemic: a nationally representative survey", European Psychiatry(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.17
  46. Ridout,  Brad, 2024. "The urgent need for an evidence-based digital mental health practice model of care for youth", Jmir Mental Health, 11:e48441-e48441. https://doi.org/10.2196/48441
  47. Saha,  Koustuv, 2024. "Editorial: digital mental health and wellbeing under crisis", Frontiers in Digital Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1404444
  48. Schyff,  Emma L. van der, Brad Ridout, Krestina L. Amon, Rowena Forsyth, and Andrew Campbell, 2023. "Providing self-led mental health support through an artificial intelligence–powered chat bot (leora) to meet the demand of mental health care", Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25:e46448. https://doi.org/10.2196/46448
  49. Skorburg,  Joshua August and Phoebe Friesen, 2021. "Mind the gaps: ethical and epistemic issues in the digital mental health response to covid‐19", The Hastings Center Report(6), 51:23-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1292
  50. Tegegne,  Masresha Derese, Binyam Tilahun, Adane Mamuye, Hailemariam Kerie, Fedlu Nurhussien, Endalkachew Zemen, Aragaw Mebratu et al., 2023. "Digital literacy level and associated factors among health professionals in a referral and teaching hospital: an implication for future digital health systems implementation", Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130894
  51. Tetri,  Birgitta, 2024. "Digital skills and intention to use digital health care and social welfare services among socially marginalized individuals in finland: a cross-sectional study", Finnish Journal of Ehealth and Ewelfare(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.23996/fjhw.143006
  52. Urquhart,  Robin, Eva Grunfeld, Lois Jackson, Joan Sargeant, and Geoffrey A. Porter, 2013. "Cross-disciplinary research in cancer: an opportunity to narrow the knowledge–practice gap", Current Oncology(6), 20:512-521. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1487
  53. Wand,  Timothy and Kathryn White, 2007. "Progression of the mental health nurse practitioner role in australia", Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing(7), 14:644-651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01147.x
  54. Wibberly,  Kathy Hsu, 2024. "Preparing mental health providers for the future: the case for moving beyond the elective telehealth course to integrating telehealth training throughout the curriculum", Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1301569
  55. Zettergren,  Linn, 2024. "Implementing digital sexual and reproductive health care services in youth clinics: a qualitative study on perceived barriers and facilitators among midwives in stockholm, sweden", BMC Health Services Research(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10932-1

Tags:
Post a Comment (0)
Previous Post Next Post